Incorporated Nucleus Circuit (INC) | Atomic Electronic Weight Chips and Circuits, Inc.

The INCs formerly known as Weight Chips seem to have the potential of only allowing the usage of ~30mW p-p (0.003 W p-p) between an inductor or resistor and/or capacitor in parallel of the inductor or resistor at the output nodes. That steady state appears after ~0.003 seconds in the simulation process. No other data capturing is possible since at that stage in the simulation, the output data fills up the hard drive chosen as the storage drive where the simulation data gets dumped. Other circuit configurations of both the Single INC and Dual INC, show other output potentials are possible and “~30mW p-p (0.003 W p-p) between an inductor or resistor and/or capacitor in parallel of the inductor or resistor at the output nodes” isn’t a limitation. Perhaps those high amplitude outputs cannot be maintained by just using an INC alone. Moreover, as all of the other projects on this website or the list of circuit configurations in the project show, high amplitude outputs can be maintained by using other circuit components to enhance an INC. That includes the usage of tiny circuits used as oscillators and output nodes use in an effort to maintain a high output threshold.

The fact remains that gaining this sort of output starts with nose in a system. Therefore, if noise cannot be maintained at a high amplitude threshold, nevertheless, it can be maintained at lower amplitude thresholds.

What’s evidential about the output potential of the INCs is that a maintained high output threshold starts with stabilized input nodes. All of the other projects on this website or the list of circuit configurations in the project with that sort of potential either uses an advanced oscillator with its own potential to power enhanced INCs or a smaller oscillator that maintains the functionality of enhanced INCs at their high amplitude thresholds by using the energy of the INCs. Neither of the techniques was tried with INCs as they are unenhanced. That means, only a battery or two batteries are used to power unenhanced INCs. INCs have to be evaluated to see if an oscillator should be used with the energy from the INCs to maintain the high output threshold. That hasn’t been tried yet with the current INC configurations. Besides, the INC products at their current development stage are sold without an oscillator and only one choice of output node enhancement.

The INC is the ignition circuit of the Type DAE Circuits and Type VAE Circuits. It isn’t the oscillator circuit used with those two products; The oscillator circuit is a different circuit. The INC merely allows the main Force Components Circuit to achieve a function that the oscillator circuit controls. The INC is designed to share harmonic frequencies with the circuit used with the oscillator. The two configurated circuits used without the oscillator amplify the accumulated charges from a battery. The amplification lasts appropriately two hours. When the oscillator is used with the two configurated circuits, that two hours is shortened to the harmonic frequencies of the oscillator, and the oscillation will continue as long as the oscillator has power. By itself, the INC can be configured to amplify accumulated charges from a battery. This functionality however is indefinite since it isn’t merged with the second stage circuit used with the oscillator.

The INC is a different way of configuring the circuits that became the Type DAE Circuits and Type VAE Circuits. It’s basically starting over. However, instead of achieving the isolation of accumulated opposite charges after the Type DAE Circuit or Type VAE Circuit is functional via a Dual XTA accumulation, AC-DC charges are harnessed in the first place and can then be or easily used in an R&D scheme of your desire.

An INC can be used in research efforts to reverse engineer a merged circuit that is the second circuit used in the initial configuration of the Type DAE Circuits and Type VAE Circuits. It is not to say that the oscillation circuit is a part of the configuration research. Your own finished product might be a combination of two circuits, the INC and the companion circuit, that will power ON by using a DC battery, not an Imaginary Battery.

An INC can be used as an incorporated circuit or a standalone circuit.

“The INC is a simple Force Components Circuit. It can be used to power low profile devices such as a tiny motor or generator that can power ON with ~100mW AC to ~20W AC.”. As such, it can be used in mechanical engineering research and developments, to run smaller motors or generators used to boost the power of larger profile machinery or heavy machinery.

Single Incorporated Nucleus Circuit (INC)

A Single INC is configured in only one way to allow the accumulation of leading and lagging charges. Moreover, it allows the accumulation of AC-DC charges. The Single INC isn’t as powerful as the Dual INC configured in two ways. Whereas the Single INC allows only a minimal amount of leading and lagging charges to be captured, the Dual INC allows the capture of more charges.

The INC is a simple Force Components Circuit. It can be used to power low profile devices such as a tiny motor or generator that can power ON with ~100mW AC to ~20W AC. By using the output currents of the INC that are approximately 3mA to 300mA, it can be achieved. The threshold voltage output of the INC is high amplitude AC-DC, the range in AC amplitude is approximately 300V AC to 2KV AC. The DC voltages allowed by the AC current and AC power amplitudes, maxes out in instantaneous ranges of P/I=DC. However, since it is still AC, it can be used to power AC motors and generators. A single DC voltage in the harmonic frequency oscillations can be 33.33V DC if at some instance in the AC current and AC power amplitudes, 100mW AC/3mA AC is satisfied. The outputs are estimated from the simulation data. No hands-on research was performed on the circuits.

Single INC Output

The output represents using the Single INC to power a circuit that accumulates a high gain in charges. The initial output of these circuits always shows a steady state or stable state where the output has reached an asymptote in amplitude output pulses or waveforms, and it won’t drop any further after ~1 millisecond from the time the circuit is powered ON. As shown, the high gain outputs allowing high amplitudes in power and voltage, are reduced in amplitude after some time. After that to output is stabilized. In the simulation the output nodes showing the decibel output, allows high voltage and power, then it is dropped from approximately 70dB to approximately 16dB as the simulation commences. The dB gain will remain in that lower range indefinitely. The output is an example of “Field strength“, even if it’s also a potential “Signal strength in telecommunications“.

The difference between these output gains and the output gains of the Type DAE Circuits or the Type VAE Circuits can be understood by a simple explanation. When a high resistive value is used to gain a high voltage output via tiny amplitude passthrough currents, even if high amplitude power can be used for an instant between the output nodes of a high resistive value, the output nodes can be shorted by placing a low resistive value between the output nodes. It might seem to be the same kind of output we see from a Type DAE Circuits. However, it might not be that since it’s an RC output, or what can be defined as a high value R series C output. The Type DAE Circuits and Type VAE Circuits are refined enough to prevent such short circuitries. However, the Single and Dual INCs are not. The Single and Dual INC allow a value in passthrough current to cause high amplitude gains in power output between output nodes. However, that only occurs between high resistive values or high value R series C output nodes. Hence, the “…output is an example of “Field strength“, even if it’s also a potential “Signal strength in telecommunications.”. In this case, most likely the latter is true. Even so the Single and Dual INCs are very powerful circuits.

As seen in the simulation, how L10 responds to the passthrough currents of the circuit, it is between high dB nodes. In time the output power is reduced from approximately 2W to approximately 360µW. Therefore, the output power is now only a “Signal strength in telecommunications“. Even if outputs from other components as seen in the simulation reached stability in retrospect of L10, the nodes between the components would still dissipate their charges if shorted by using a low resistive circuit component value. At times when components like L10 starts to dissipate charges, the frequency in output pulses or waveforms reduce in times of appearance. It means the circuit is still powerful, however, the frequency of the outputs remains reduced. In a hands-on exercise, and in such cases, a drop in power at the high frequencies allowed by the circuits won’t be noticed by the naked eyes as power loss by simply perceiving the functionality of something being powered by the circuit. In this case, the power loss between L10 is definite in a simulation or hands-on environment. However, that isn’t the end of gaining useable power from this INC. This output example from the Single INC configuration is only one of many output potentials.

This Single INC is supposed to be powered by two batteries. One of the batteries was replaced with C2 and C3. The simulation was restarted multiple times. At one instance, C2 and C3 were replaced with L14 and L15. When the latter configuration is used, it can be seen that the difference in “…the frequency in output pulses or waveforms, [of the INC increases] in times of appearance.”.

Dual Incorporated Nucleus Circuit (INC)

A Dual INC can do everything that a Single INC can do, however, the Dual INC is more powerful. A Dual INC allows a set of AC-DC charges or leading and lagging charges to be captured, one waveform from each INC. The Dual INC is more powerful than the Single INC because a greater accumulated amount in the frequency of leading and lagging charges are captured.