• The propulsion method is feasible because of the nature of the fields used in the propulsion method. Force Components Circuits are used in accumulating a high amplitude of free charges. The acceleration of charges is achieved between 1 second to ~30 minutes in some cases. Once constructed, the derived Type DAE and Type VAE power source solutions licensed in the propulsion scheme will power ON in ~30 minutes. Theoretically, the power source solutions will power ON from free charges or 2e-38 V to 2e-9 V in charges. i.e., the charges are protons and electrons, and 2e-38 V is ~1.602176634×10−19 C + ~1.602176634×10−19 C. I suppose it should be 3.204353268e-38 V. However, it doesn’t matter since 3.204353268e-38 V is larger than 2e-38 V even if more is valuable than less. Even if it is in any case than sustaining quantum values, and failure in finding a solution is imminent, either value is OK. The simulations show that quantum mathematics was reached, and variables were contained at ranges below 1e-9 V even if resistivity at output nodes was below 1e-6 Ω. Some Force Components Circuits can manage inputs from as low as 1e-300 V in charges.
  • In the propulsion scheme, it is the type of field harnessing and the collapse prevention of the harnessed field that will allow the propulsion scheme to work. The image top left shows undampened angular fields, and the image bottom right shows dampened angular fields. The plate orientations are also a key factor in the functionality of the propulsion scheme. You can imagine the image on the top left showing undampened angular fields, which is stagnation in flight, and the image on the bottom right showing dampened angular fields Is flight.

—I try to compare the potentiality of known elementary or unknown elementary charges allowing the accumulation of more charges or the availability of such to currently ongoing Muon Research in physics and photography. I had to step back and be awed by the newly discovered potentials of particles existing that are 200 times larger than an Electron and have a “2.2 µs lifetime”. However, according to ongoing Muon Research in physics and photography, the research and data gathering through photography is difficult because finding a Muon source is difficult—

—The propulsion research might not harness a field during the power source’s functionality allowing the accumulation of Muons, however, the power sources are powered by unknown elementary charges allowing the accumulation of more charges, and unknown field harnessing or fields other than electromagnetic fields are harnessed. The nature of the fields by default hints at the harnessed fields being the gravitational field. The fields are harnessed using Force Components used as a Tensor in a circuit that mimics condensed or focal areas. The Tensor comparison was added to the research later after learning about Einstein’s Tensor. Graphical and mathematical models are abundant. The model presented here is a post-physical model—

—This research on Force Components Circuits started around 1995. Since then, the two kinds of Force Components Circuits discovered are active kinds and passive kinds. Active Force Components Circuits oscillate permanently. They are renewable energy power sources having high amplitudes in active isolated accumulated charges in at least one node bunched up with many having the same XTA value. However, since in this case by using Active Force Components Circuits, one of such nodes is impossible, the isolated charges branch out from a High X Threshold Amplitude (XTA) Active DC Node to Extending Active DC nodes leading to very low amplitudes in accumulated active charges. Some isolated nodes of the Force Components Circuits are even AC nodes—

—These circuits oscillate indefinitely recharging themselves. Passive Force Components Circuits do not oscillate permanently. After being powered ON, they have a time constant in which their XTA reaches an amplitude in saturated inactive charges—

—In ongoing research, no simulation or hands-on research information is in the ongoing research showing any or the full potential of using Passive Force Components Circuits in a propulsion scheme. The research and circuitries used in that research were abandoned in 2001. Researching Active Force Components Circuits started in 2003. The first breakthrough was achieved in 2006. However, there is no hands-on research information showing the full potential of using Active Force Components Circuits in a propulsion scheme—

—There is a hypothesis used in the development of the circuits for the task at hand. Hypothetically Force Components Circuits allow the harnessing of a force other than the electromagnetic force. Using Force Components Circuits in a propulsion scheme by having the potential of influencing any form of matter between output nodes, allows a massive force in matter expulsion or attraction. Expulsion or attraction are at least two orders of functionalities. Unlike using an electromagnetic field, any form of matter expulsion or attraction is an expression of three orders of functionalities. Adding motion of the package or flyable craft allowed by expulsion or attraction is an expression of another three orders of functionalities, and so forth. The latter, former, and first notions were paraphrased and indirectly quoted from the link on Tensor in the same fashion as learning about Einstein’s Tensor. I did not know about Tensors—

Origin of the Derived Type Circuit DAE and Type VAE Circuit
  • Once the natural oscillation of the Force Components Circuits reaches ~1GHz in frequency, the isolated X Threshold Amplitude nodes allow the usage of high amplitude output power at low currents. Even at low currents, it was necessary to diminish the original outputs of the circuits to lower outputs in power at the output impedance nodes. Without that solution in hands-on research, the entire power source would be an output node with the potential of being unmanageable and dangerous. Lowered power, however, prevents the output nodes from being consistent or redundant in retaining stored charges, and lowered power doesn’t mean lowered XTA. Except for how strange a Tera XTA looks in a presentation, I was never sure that such a high XTA was incorrect or impossible as an expression of real isolated charges. I hypothesize that low passthrough currents make a high XTA functional or it is doable in hands-on experimentations.
  • While the circuit functionality is perfect at low currents, the lowered power and XTA solution allowed by some derived circuits of the Original Circuit, or the circuits having output nodes like the Derived Type DAE Circuit’s output impedance nodes, aren’t very useful at low currents. A range in capacitance between 1pF to 68pF can be used as an Output Module (C28) between the Type DAE output impedance nodes. The Output Module (C28) capacitance set at any of the values in the range, has a high amplitude in accumulated charges allowed by the fields interacting between the output nodes. That high threshold in output value can be easily interfered with by using a range in capacitance value of anything greater than 68pF.
  • If the original state of the circuit’s output impedance nodes were used having a Terawatt between the output nodes, it can be shorted by as minute as 0.2Ω and the output nodes will remain functional with power outputs. The power source will retain Gigavolts to Teravolts XTA, and the CTA of the power source will rise a bit and remain at an acceptable current management level. Any deviation in the resistive value placed between the output nodes that is less than 0.2Ω, the output nodes only allow room temperature superconductive currents. 0.2Ω is a value in resistivity much greater than 1e-15Ω, a value in resistivity that a Type VAE Circuit can manage in parallel with the output nodes.
  • There are Type VAE Circuits discovered in ongoing research that have low CTA and at least 100W between the output nodes. Either they can be used to replace high CTA Type VAE Circuits or future research in using Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits having low CTA, and capable of harnessing high amplitude power at the output nodes must be of top priority. The thing about low-current parallel modules is if an output node allows 100W, it doesn’t matter how big the grid can be without power loss. The entire grid will still be 100W. On the other hand, if an output node allows 1GW, the entire grid will still be 1GW. To remedy the error in this case, multi-power sources would have to power a limited set of modules in tiny grids.
  • The Gigavolts to Teravolts XTA propulsion method was abandoned. Hypothetically, except if built on a larger scale, a small-scale construction of a High Amplitude XTA circuit would be dangerous. High amplitude output power nodes are isolated in the power source if not at the output nodes or used as output nodes.
  • Even if the Type DAE Circuit is a solution to the original circuit, it isn’t enough of a solution.
  • Some high amplitude output power nodes of the original circuit can’t be tapped directly in a propulsion scheme. Therefore, if the untapped high amplitude output power nodes are left unchecked, it is bad and against the original hypothesis and efforts in developing such a power source. It can’t be used as a power source as is or a power source used in a propulsion scheme. Most of the power will be retained within the confinement of the power source until buckling and expansion from the forces within the confinement rip the power source apart. It isn’t simply expulsion that’s an issue, attraction is a potential issue also, that can cause condensed physical manifestations. Moreso, the original circuit is more unsafe than a power source of the same kind that reaches XTA saturation in 30 minutes.
A Type VAE Circuit is a Type DAE Circuit
  • Even if the Type VAE Circuit output impedance nodes have high CTA passing through it, A Type VAE Circuit is the best potential solution in achieving propulsion in the hands-on research.
  • The natural oscillation of the Force Components Circuits is natural because the circuits are solid state:
    • Initial Charge Accumulation, Charges Saturation, and Circuit Stability are achieved by this solid-state circuitry.
  • There may be two kinds of output impedance nodes that Force Components Circuits allow, that are suitable for the task at hand. They are Low-current high-power output impedance nodes, and high-current high-power output impedance nodes. Force Components Circuits allow the harnessing of useful fields at low passthrough currents allowing high amplitude power output. High amplitude power output at low current seems to be the ultimate solution in developing the Flux Angular Dampening (FAD) Propulsion System in the project. Even if that outcome was beyond the development of the project, in the patent information it’s been hypothesized to be the inevitable goal or solution.
  • Type DAE Circuit output impedance nodes are Low-current high-power output impedance nodes.
  • Type VAE Circuit output impedance nodes are high-current high-power output impedance nodes.
  • Low-current high power output impedance nodes are usable between any atmospheric density except a vacuumed atmospheric density. It’s not a definition of resistivity between the nodes even if it can be defined as 1/1πfC, it’s still a matter of forces interacting with matter between the nodes. The output nodes of a Type DAE Circuit also carry with it a large potential for nodal interference.
  • If the high-power output impedance nodes of a Type DAE Circuit were used in a vacuumed atmospheric environment, the output dissipates to zero, and even the X threshold Amplitude dissipates. The Type DAE Circuit would fail to power ON. There are unknown variables between the output nodes of the circuit that keep it functional. Initially, the tolerable solution was 1pF. More unknown variables show themselves to be ~1pF to 68pF in capacitance. The solution against those limitations seems to be a solution by using two low-current high-power output Type DAE Circuits having opposite XTAs. In that sense, when the Dual Output Nodes of the circuits meet between output nodes, a VAE Solution at low currents might be possible. Except for that notion, there are other unstable solutions in the research showing that low-current high-power VAE Solutions are possible. Those solutions are unreliable in using a single power source to power an entire grid having hundreds of parallel modules. They normally fail because the output nodes can only manage one to two VAE Modules. No parallel modules are possible beyond two parallel modules. The circuit CTA rises. One notion supporting the redundancy of using a single Type DAE Circuit; If the nodes are already ON, and they are exposed to a vacuumed environment, will the Type DAE circuit shut OFF? This notion isn’t the same as gaining initial power. In this case, the power source is already ON. The answer can only be known from beyond the simulation research or in a hands-on research effort. In the original Type DAE Circuit solution, the current between the output nodes is ~1mA to ~5mA p-p. That dissipates and is not replenished since the output nodes are exposed to the vacuum. The Type VAE Circuit solution allows the output nodes to be exposed to the vacuum and the circuit stays functional. “The thing about low-current parallel modules is if an output node allows 100W, it doesn’t matter how big the grid can be without power loss. The entire grid will still be 100W. On the other hand, if an output node allows 1GW, the entire grid will still be 1GW. To remedy the error in this case, multi-power sources would have to power a limited set of modules in tiny grids.”.
  • The other thing is that the output retention of the Type VAE Circuits allowing the output nodes to have isolated charges, occurs because it is the Permeability of free space (μ0). Imagine that in this case, between the output nodes, materials are violently interacting. Some questions are:
    • Where does the matter go during the free interactions?
—We Know That the Output Between the Nodes can Collapse—

—Let’s mind our thoughts and remember that this isn’t research dealing with electromagnetic fields, and such predictions from the latter and already achieved results in currently available physics research, show that unknown expressions of force interactions in physics will be at hand in this research effort. Moreover, half of the work, the most important part was already performed for your convenience, and more solutions are yet to come—

  • Why won’t the output between the nodes collapse shutting off the Type VAE Circuit?
  • Or in the research, how do we improve on the output collapse prevention of ~150KW to 1GW between the output nodes at low passthrough currents of the Type DAE Circuits?
  • Which other ways can prevent the collapse of the output of the Type DAE Circuits?
  • How powerful is a single Type DAE Circuit’s output module at ~150KW to 1GW?
  • By using a Type VAE Circuit that’s defined as being a Type VAE Circuit and a Type DAE Circuit; What happens if 10 output modules x 5KW or 50KW are used in an array perpendicular to the DAE medium?
  • What happens if 200,000 output modules x 5KW or ~1GW are used in an array perpendicular to the DAE or VAE mediums?

—Exaggeration in output potentials or even such an experiment probably shouldn’t be done, especially within a DAE medium. With the increased potential of friction, hot reentry variables at any altitude within a dense atmosphere may occur. And within a VAE medium, less is more, therefore traversing at faster speeds in any atmospheric density requires less effort—

  • The Type DAE and Type VAE circuit configurations are derived from a Dual Gigavolts to Teravolts XTA Power Source. The maximum output in power amplitudes of a Dual or Single Gigavolts to Teravolts XTA Power Source @ 7A p-p through the output nodes is ~200 Gigawatts to 1 Terawatts between the output nodes. The Dual or Single ~200 Gigavolts to ~1 Teravolts XTA power sources’ Current Threshold Amplitude (CTA) is just as well ~7A p-p. Except for the current amplitudes, the output power and XTA of these circuits seem to be a 1 to 1 exchange. Meaning, 1V = 1W at times. The currently derived solutions from such unmanageable and dangerous Terawatts and teravolts outcomes allow the management in outputs of a lowered ~150KW p-p to 1GW @ a CTA of ~1mA to ~5mA p-p called a Type DAE Circuit. The Type DAE Circuit and Type VAE Circuit configuration solutions are derived circuits that have a XTA in the range of ~150KV to ~1GV.
  • In the ongoing circuit simulation research efforts, it’s been discovered that a XTA can be positive or negative, and no Active Force Components Circuits have a dual XTA. Passive Force Components Circuits have a dual XTA. However, if using a Passive Force Components Circuit, both XTA polarities aren’t accessible at once. Either polarity is acceptable in usage to power something with the right output parameters creating a link with a companion node. In retrospect, a manual switch was used in some experiments to switch polarities at the output nodes of a low-output circuit or a circuit version with no passive high XTA. When the switch at the output nodes of the circuit was flipped, the polarities of the nodes flipped. In that case, if the passive high XTA was present in the circuit, the polarity of the passive high XTA would flip. The first experiment that included accessing the passive high XTA resulted in zero output of the entire circuit. It’s the typical result of accessing a passive high XTA. The next step in the research should have been the isolation of polarity by using its potential opposite charge. I didn’t think ahead to realize that and never returned to the project. No other enhancement research was performed in the project since it was abandoned.
Original Solution of the Derived Type DAE Circuit and Type VAE Circuit
  • The original solution (~200 Gigawatts to 1 Terawatts) of the derived solutions above has never been posted on any former Atomic Electronic Weight Chips and Circuits, Inc. website whose domain names were lost through technicalities or abandonment. The work on the derivative solution circuits was deemed inefficient in using real values in circuit components. At least one set of capacitive component values in the circuits was mistyped as a capacitive component of 0.05pF in value, which should have been 0.5pF or 0.1pf. The 0.05pF circuit design parameters are perfect. The 0.5pF or 0.1pf circuit design parameters led to design problems that caused higher capacitive value components to fail in the research efforts by allowing merged signals to dissipate the functional outputs of already functional circuits configured in the 0.05pF circuit design parameters. I used the 0.05pF value in the designs because from researching the part, I felt they existed. The 0.05pF circuit design parameters caused high amplitude transient currents in some of the circuit configurations used in the research efforts. The Type DAE Circuit and Type VAE Circuit designed by using the 0.5pF circuit design parameters, are the best stable solutions between the 0.05pF circuit design parameters and the 0.5pF circuit design parameters. However, in the new research efforts that is becoming a false posiitive. After years of research, it became less clear if any capacitive component of 0.05pF in value was a real component value. Sure, in the past they could have been ordered in precision component value orders or embedded in a PCB. However, searches on websites such as Ohmite, and DigiKey, hardly showed any lead to the existence of the 0.05pFcapacitive component value. For years a great mistake was made in my judgment to use the 0.05pFcapacitive component value in my research. I realized the values were listed as component tolerance. Therefore, a less powerful 0.5pF capacitive component circuit design was used to replace the circuits in the research efforts. A great mistake was also made in my judgment to use the 0.5pFcapacitive component value in my research. The functionalities of the circuities are horribly flawed. Since the 0.05pFcapacitive component value are the best choice in useable components in the designs, to date, the 0.05pF capacitive component values are still being researched. and since the components now exist, the option to reissue them in the research as valuable is no longer a debate. They are open for usage in the research efforts.

To view one of the videos without effort, please r-click on the video image and open it in a new browser window or tab:

Type DAE Solution Circuit Output
Type VAE and DAE Solution Circuit Output
  • High current high power output impedance nodes are functional between many atmospheric densities. A limitation may exist. Below a resistivity of 1e-15Ω, the Type VAE Circuit Solution starts to fail. The 1e-15Ω output potentials are beyond the Vacuum primitivity (ε0) and not manageable by the circuits. In this case, including the vacuumed atmospheric density output, the maximum output power amplitude is less than 10 KW p-p at high amplitude passthrough currents.
  • If the high-power output impedance nodes of a Type DAE Circuit were used in a vacuumed atmospheric environment, the output dissipates to zero, and even the X threshold Amplitude dissipates. The Type DAE Circuit would fail to power ON. There are unknown variables between the output nodes of the circuit that keep it functional. Initially, the tolerable solution was 1pF. More unknown variables show themselves to be ~1pF to 68pF in capacitance. The solution against those limitations seems to be a solution by using two low-current high-power output Type DAE Circuits having opposite XTAs. In that sense, when the Dual Output Nodes of the circuits meet between output nodes, a VAE Solution at low currents might be possible. Except for that notion, there are other unstable solutions in the research showing that low-current high-power VAE Solutions are possible. Those solutions are unreliable in using a single power source to power an entire grid having hundreds of parallel modules. They normally fail because the output nodes can only manage one to two VAE Modules….
  • In the research to mimic the value of the resistivity in a vacuumed atmospheric environment, output modules ranging in resistive values between a low range of 1e-15Ω to 1e-6Ω are used between the output impedance nodes of a Type VAE Circuit Solution. Any Type VAE Circuit Solution that cannot allow an output below a resistive value of 1e-5Ω, is only harnessing an electromagnetic field in the effort of accumulating charges to saturate an XTA. If the resistivity was lowered to 1e-6Ω, saturation dissipation would occur, and the power source would not function. In any event that the Type VAE Circuit Solution can maintain charge saturation between the resistive range of 1e-15Ω to 1e-6Ω, is the harnessing of the gravitational field in the effort of accumulating charges to saturate a XTA. The results are only hypothesized because they are what’s achieved when Force Components Circuits are used.

—Again. Let’s mind our thoughts and remember that this isn’t research dealing with electromagnetic fields, and such predictions from the latter and already achieved results in currently available physics research, show that unknown expressions of force interactions in physics will be at hand in this research effort. Moreover, half of the work, the most important part was already performed for your convenience, and more solutions are yet to come—

  • In this case, as we go beyond the Vacuum primitivity (ε0), either the power source will completely dissipate all saturated charges, or a strange occurrence starts to happen.
  • In ongoing research in the project, even Room temperature Superconductivity is achieved. Some circuit configurations use a resistive range of 1e-15Ω to 1e-6Ω at the output nodes or resistive values within the Vacuum primitivity (ε0) potential, and somewhere below the Permeability of free space (μ0), room temperature Superconductivity is achievable. Electromagnetic fields are then harnessed and able to play a role in the Force Components Circuit solutions. Unlike the harnessed fields in the Type DAE and Type VAE circuit solutions, the residual wattage and resistivity between the output module allowed by the fields making superconductivity happen, wouldn’t allow the interaction with all forms of matter. There will only be an interaction between charged particles, other fields, plasma, and ferrous elements. In this case, the usage of superconductivity seems to be a means of interacting with matter, by using electromagnetic fields in which we get to start over from scratch if other kinds of physics were not achieved. Even by using Force Components Circuits, room temperature Superconductivity won’t allow other kinds of physics.

To view one of the videos without effort, please r-click on the video image and open it in a new browser window or tab:

Room Temperature Superconductivity
Bypassing Superconductivity
  • The licensed research will allow the licensees to explore many alternatives in developing the products or their products.
  • Using this kind of potential technology will take a lot of resources because this research is dangerous.
  • The pros of doing this kind of research are that we are on Earth and far from being close to a vacuum environment. Therefore, a Type DAE Force Components Circuit will be a great choice to license. Using a Type DAE Force Components Circuit allowing Dense Atmospheric Environment Output Modules at the output nodes in the research is a hands-on source in which one kind of research development is performed and many kinds of data are gathered:
    • Research and development of a Type DAE Circuit or power source.
    • The research would allow physics research by using physical matter in between ~1pF to 68pF value in capacitance in the open air.
    • Finetuning of the development to use it with DAE Output Modules or flight arrays.
    • Building DAE Output Modules or flight arrays.
    • Finetuning of the DAE Output Modules or flight arrays.
    • Usage of DAE Output Modules or researching flight simulations within the DAE, which includes isolated environmental research such as using dense atmospheric components.
    • The research efforts don’t include Configuring Dual XTA nodes by configuring opposite polarity Dual XTA Type DAE Output Circuits or Dual XTA Type VAE Output Circuits.
  • When a Type VAE Force Components Circuit or power source is used, any atmosphere density output can be achieved. Therefore, outputs aren’t bound to the same atmospheric environment in which we currently reside. A Type VAE Force Components Circuit will be a great choice to license. Using a Type VAE Force Components Circuit allowing Vacuumed or Dense Atmospheric Environment Output Modules at the output nodes in the research is a hands-on source in which two kinds of research developments are performed and many kinds of data are gathered:
    • Research and development of a Type VAE power source.
    • The research would allow physics research by using physical matter in between any value in capacitance in the open air and resistive value in range of 1e-15Ω to 100TΩ which includes vacuumed medium research.
    • Finetuning of the development to use it with VAE and DAE Output Modules or flight arrays.
    • Building VAE and DAE Output Modules or flight arrays.
    • Finetuning of the VAE and DAE Output Modules or flight arrays.
    • Usage of VAE and DAE Output Modules or researching flight simulations within the VAE and DAE, which includes isolated environmental research such as using vacuumed or dense atmospheric components.
    • The research efforts don’t include Configuring Dual XTA nodes by configuring opposite polarity Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits or Dual XTA Type VAE Circuits.
  • The research in using a Type DAE Circuit or Type VAE Circuit allows the gathering of propulsion data and knowing the integrity of the power source and Output Modules or Flight Arrays. Type DAE Single XTA Node Circuits or Type VAE Single XTA Node Circuits or power sources are what’s licensable.
  • The Type DAE Single XTA Node Circuit is perfect to use in fabricating Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits or otherwise using a Type VAE Circuit in fabricating Dual XTA Type VAE Circuits. However, other research licenses than the Type DAE Circuit or Type VAE Circuit licenses allow the usage of Dual XTA Type Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits or Dual XTA Type VAE Circuits or power sources.
  • Type VAE Circuits are perfect for Room Temperature Superconductivity research, and it is allowed with either a Type DAE Circuit or a Type VAE Circuit license.
Positive or Negative XTA Polarity
  • A XTA can be positive or negative. The positive and negative XTA power sources can be combined as one. Depending on the stability of the configuration, both XTAs can remain active after a Dual XTA circuit is configured. Like all other charge saturation dissipation explained thus far, sometimes only one polarity of the XTAs remains dominantly high.
  • In excessive changes in capacitive values at the output nodes of Type DAE Circuits or where increases in capacitive values of the circuits are made, charge saturation dissipation occurs. That renders the power sources useless. Moreover, when decreases in capacitive values of the circuits are made, charge saturation remains stable.
  • Other changes in any capacitive values of a Force Components Circuit:
    • Allow the CTA to rise in amplitude allowing a rise in the XTA.
    • Allow the CTA to drop in amplitude allowing a drop in the XTA.
    • Allow ON Time Delay.
    • Allow Power ON Failure.
    • A 100 Kilovolt to 1G range XTA may revert to being a 200 Gigavolts to 1 Teravolts XTA. Again. “Hypothetically, except if built on a larger scale, a small-scale construction of a High Amplitude XTA circuit would be dangerous. High amplitude output power nodes are isolated in the power source if not at the output nodes or used as output nodes.”. The power source will then have to be reconfigured to become a 100-kilovolt to 1GV XTA range circuit. It is potentially only possible to safely alter Force Components Circuits’ component values in simulation experiments since a hands-on attempt at rectification of the solutions is dangerous.
Schematic Simulation Applications
  • All other spice applications fail due to the complex output variables created by active Force Components Circuits:
    • All the simulation research experiments in this project were performed by using LTspice. LTspice is a circuit simulation software that is free to use in commercial applications.
    • iCircuit was also used successfully in gaining data outputs from Force Components Circuits.
Super Circuits
  • Type DAE Circuits or Type VAE Circuits allow the output impedance nodes to house many parallel modules that function together, or many power sources can house a module that functions with other modules in an output power array. The latter choice is counterproductive since only fallible output nodes require the usage of a limited number of parallel modules.

Force Components Circuits

The Type DAE Dual XTA Nodes Circuit and The Type VAE Dual XTA Nodes Circuit
  • Notes:
    • A Type DAE Circuit or power source and a Type VAE Circuit or power source are Type Dual XTA Circuits. Unlike sustained Dual XTAs, the Type DAE Circuit and Type VAE Circuit have merged Dual XTAs
    • A Type DAE power source is configured differently than a Type VAE power source.
    • The difference between a Type DAE and a Type VAE power source is that only a single X Threshold Amplitude is tapped directly in configuring the Type VAE power source. A single XTA and another or companion output node are tapped instead of both XTA nodes.
    • In configuring a Type DAE power source, both X Threshold Amplitudes are tapped. In that case the XTA nodes must be prevented from dissipating any charges which will render the power source and output nodes powerless.
    • “In the ongoing circuit simulation research efforts, it’s been discovered that a XTA can be positive or negative, and no Active Force Components Circuits have a dual XTA. Passive Force Components Circuits have a dual XTA. However, if using a Passive Force Components Circuit, both XTA polarities aren’t accessible at once. Either polarity is acceptable in usage to power something with the right output parameters creating a link with a companion node.”.
    • Passive XTA Circuits vs Active XTA Circuits. In the configuration of a Type VAE Circuit, the companion node used with the tapped XTA allows current flow through the Output Module used in the solution. In this case, high current flow occurs since the XTA is reduced as part of the configuration solution. Both Passive XTA Circuits and Active XTA Circuits require a companion node rather than another XTA in a Dual XTA setup to gain power output. It was possible to try using a Dual XTA setup in both cases. Since the original Force Components Circuit or Passive XTA Circuit is no longer a project in ongoing research efforts, there isn’t much else that is known about a Passive XTA Circuit and no Dual XTA research is possible with it. Currently, a Dual XTA setup is configured as the Type DAE Circuit. Most of what’s possible can be assumed from looking at the current research efforts concerning Active XTA Circuits. In retrospect, in the ongoing research, there is another Force Components Circuit having Passive XTAs housed Dual and High. However, it performs like an Active XTA Circuit. Mainly it’s just for ownership and to show one of many varieties of the fundamental workings of Force Components Circuits used in the patent information. In hands-on research, it would perform better than the original Passive XTA Circuit. As hypothesized, the currently published Passive XTA Circuit in the patent information has oppositely charged Dual XTAs. However, it performs like an Active XTA Circuit. Other than to view simulation data, no output nodes were assigned to the circuit. “Mainly it’s just for ownership and to show one of many varieties of the fundamental workings of Force Components Circuits used in the patent information”.
    • Both the Type DAE Circuit and the Type VAE Circuit are licensable in the Propulsion Energy Research. They are the same device. However, the way they function they are two kinds of Circuits. The difference between the configurations allowing one to be called a Type VAE circuit, is in how they function. From the published date here (12/2023) to 12/23/2023, licensable solutions were not possible at the peak of discovering functional solutions in the research by using any solutions. I preferred not to license anything too experimental. The original solution of the derived Type DAE Circuit and the Type VAE Circuit were published on the former website to be licensed. That offer is now off the table.
    • The new findings aren’t even a year old:
      • The research efforts were performed as a part of another project in XTA management. The solutions allow direct access in coupling via XTA nodes, and Dual XTAs of two, four, or eight Force Components Circuits working together.
    • Dual Merged XTAs of a Type DAE Circuit:
      • In the research, it was discovered that no capacitive components greater than 68pF in capacitive value can be placed between the output nodes of a Type DAE Circuit that functions because of direct access in coupling via Dual XTA nodes.
    • The Type VAE Circuit Still Functions:
      • Power dissipation does not happen with the Type VAE Circuit which has the potential of having output nodes that can be made parallel with a vacuumed environment or component module. While it is perfect that the Type DAE Circuit having low CTA allows the usage of high amplitude power at the output nodes, the Type DAE output impedance nodes aren’t very useful at low currents. Power loss is definite at the output nodes when the nodes are stressed. For the intended purposes however, a range in capacitance between 1pF to 68pF can be used as an Output Module (C28) between the Type DAE output impedance nodes, and the power needed for such impedances will be met.
    • Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits. Mergerless XTA:
      • Surpassing the Type DAE Circuits and the Type VAE Circuits in functionality. The Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits are the best choices in fusion research. They would allow seamless initialization in opposite charges accumulation and storage for fusion research.
    • There may be two kinds of output impedance nodes that Force Components Circuits allow, that are suitable for the task at hand. They are Low-current high-power output impedance nodes, and high-current high-power output impedance nodes. Force Components Circuits allow the harnessing of useful fields at low passthrough currents allowing high amplitude power output. High amplitude power output at low current seems to be the ultimate solution in developing the Flux Angular Dampening (FAD) Propulsion System in the project. Even if that outcome was beyond the development of the project, in the patent information it’s been hypothesized to be the inevitable goal or solution.
    • If the high-power output impedance nodes of a Type DAE Circuit were used in a vacuumed atmospheric environment, the output dissipates to zero, and even the X threshold Amplitude dissipates. The Type DAE Circuit would fail to power ON. There are unknown variables between the output nodes of the circuit that keep it functional. Initially, the tolerable solution was 1pF. More unknown variables show themselves to be ~1pF to 68pF in capacitance. The solution against those limitations seems to be a solution by using two low-current high-power output Type DAE Circuits having opposite XTAs. In that sense, when the Dual Output Nodes of the circuits meet between output nodes, a VAE Solution at low currents might be possible.
  • It is now possible to use Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits that function by having high amplitude output power without using extremely high XTA circuits. Compared to what high XTA is, the XTA of the Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits is not Teravolts, it’s ~1GV. 1GV XTA is a derivative of Teravolts XTA. The Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits follow the same rules in configuration as the Type DAE Circuits. In their finished build, the Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits should have opposite polarity XTAs and be ready to be used with high power between the output nodes. In comparison, by using a Type VAE Circuit by tapping only a single XTA and a companion node, only then are the output nodes functional in powering anything. The three developments concern having a way to harness both gravitational fields (Fields used in influencing any form of matter) and electromagnetic fields (“There will only be an interaction between charged particles, other fields, plasma, and ferrous elements.”), and making them work side by side in one circuit.
  • Even room temperature superconductive circuit solutions were found in research efforts. Some of the solutions have reduced XTAs in the potential range of 100KV to ~1GV. Mainly the recently discovered superconductive circuit solutions having a XTA in the range of 100KV to 1MV, are single XTA Type VAE circuits.
  • Room temperature superconductive circuit solutions can be configured as a single XTA single Force Components Circuit at a XTA range of 100KV to 300KV. Superconductive circuit solutions can be used in electromagnetic shielding and other deployment techniques that are usable in some licensed developments.
Atmospheric Propulsion
  • In the vacuumed environment research concerning propulsion research, the VAE Output Module (ReN5) is already exposed to the lowest resistivity decided upon or it is one value of a range in resistance of 1e-15Ω to 1e-6Ω. The DAE Output Module (C28) concerning propulsion research, evidently housed between the output nodes of a Type VAE Circuit, is functional in any atmospheric density. What’s happening is one circuit is used for two things. The DAE Output Module (C28) can have the VAE Output Module (ReN5) in parallel with it and the Type DAE Power Source becomes the Type VAE Power Source. It simply would take a bit of tinkering to reconfigure a Type DAE Circuit into a Type VAE Circuit.
Atmospheric Propulsion Research
  • In some cases, a module is used in parallel to output nodes. They are defined as parallel components used in isolating charges from other atmospheric values, a vacuumed tube for instance. In other cases, the parallel component is an atmospheric environmental density. The DAE is a Dense Atmospheric Environment. Open air for instance. The VAE is a Vacuum Atmospheric Environment. That’s self-explanatory. The Type DAE Power Source cannot achieve a parallel to vacuumed environmental output feat at the output nodes since it is configured to use Dual XTAs. The Type VAE Power Source is configured to use a single polarity XTA node and a companion node. The configuration allows one XTA of the Dual Circuit yet having the same polarity to stay isolated. It’s not a perfect or exact science because the one isolated XTA of two, or the redundant Power Sources’ isolated XTA can be any amplitude in saturated charges. In most of the solutions, the isolated XTA can be ~300V DC. It’s just that the XTA coupled with the companion XTA is higher in value. The Output Module (C28) of the Type DAE Circuit allows lower power source CTA than the Type VAE Circuit’s Output Module (ReN5). However, the Output Module (ReN5) isn’t causing power consumption when maintaining the performance of heavy work since the power sources allowing heavy work are renewable energy power sources.
High CTA and Low CTA
  • High CTA when XTA reduction occurs happens because the Gigavolts to Teravolts XTA allowing the derived 100 Kilovolt to 1G range XTA, is still active in the XTA reducing configuration. The dissipated XTA charges turn into high amplitude current by the XTA reduction and increased flow of charges.
  • In cases when a Dual XTA Node Type DAE power source is configured, and both X Threshold Amplitudes are tapped, high amplitude current reduction flow may be achieved. A Type DAE power source having merged dual XTAs on the other hand, allows current dissipation when the output nodes are tapped by impedances greater than 68pF in capacitance. Current dissipation occurs since there isn’t a high enough current amplitude to keep the power source ON. A Dual XTA Node Type DAE Circuit or power source has potential, “…a VAE Solution at low currents might be possible. Except for that notion, there are other unstable solutions in the research showing that low-current high-power VAE Solutions are possible. Those solutions are unreliable in using a single power source to power an entire grid having hundreds of parallel modules. They normally fail because the output nodes can only manage one to two VAE Modules. No parallel modules are possible beyond two parallel modules. The circuit CTA rises. One notion supporting the redundancy of […] using a single Type DAE Circuit; If the nodes are already ON, and they are exposed to a vacuumed environment, will the Type DAE circuit shut OFF? This notion isn’t the same as gaining initial power. In this case, the power source is already ON. The answer can only be known from beyond the simulation research or in a hands-on research effort. In the original Type DAE Circuit solution, the current between the output nodes is ~1mA to ~5mA p-p […]. That dissipates and is not replenished since the output nodes are exposed to the vacuum. The Type VAE Circuit solution allows the output nodes to be exposed to the vacuum and the circuit stays functional. “The thing about low-current parallel modules is if an output node allows 100W, it doesn’t matter how big the grid can be without power loss. The entire grid will still be 100W. On the other hand, if an output node allows 1GW, the entire grid will still be 1GW. To remedy the error in this case, multi-power sources would have to power a limited set of modules in tiny grids.”.
Miscellaneous Research Using Type DAE Circuit
  • The Type DAE power source or circuit isn’t useless. Note that the accumulation of isolated charges is an isolation of free charges. Using a Type DAE Circuit even if the polarities of the two XTAs are the same, current reduction flow is achieved or is a problem if the power of the output nodes is low. The Type DAE Circuit simulation videos show that the merged XTAs of two Force Components Circuits becoming the same polarity, isn’t a problem. However, current or power reduction may occur during functionality if the output nodes of the merged circuits are stressed. Mainly, the Type DAE Circuit is useful in research science, or it can be used in isolating one charge polarity.
  • Opposite XTA polarity Type DAE Circuits, if the license allows, can be used in isolating the accumulation of two opposite charge polarities to be used in fusion experiments. Type DAE Circuits will allow the maximum yield in charge amplitude at low currents. Not that it is a problem, and the facts are unknown. However, it will take time to accumulate charges.

—”The SI defines the coulomb by taking the fixed numerical value of the elementary charge e to be 1.602176634×10−19 coulombs,[8] [9] but was previously defined in terms of the forces 2 wires exert on each other. The coulomb was originally defined, using the latter definition of the ampere, as 1 A × 1 s.[10] […] One coulomb is the charge of approximately 6241509074460762607.776 elementary charges, where the number is the reciprocal of 1.602176634×10−19 C.[11] [Wikipedia Coulomb]”—

Elementary Charges Accumulation Hypothesis
  • The frequency of the circuit being ON is 1GHz. Even if the current of the Type DAE Circuits is ~1mA to 5mA, the yield in accumulated charges is still high in changes per second. Each 1A/s = 277,777.777Hz since 1,000,000,000Hz/602 = 277,777.777Hz. Charges per second will be 277,777.777Hz × 6241509074460762607.776 elementary charges = 1,733,752,520,683,545,168,826,666.6666667 elementary charges or isolated unused current of 277,777.777/2 = 69,444.44425A protons and 69,444.44425A electrons. The isolated changes won’t be active, however, if merged will yield a current of 277,777.777A/s. There are ways to use lower yields in current amplitudes since we are speaking of isolated and free elementary changes, however, that’s not in this explanation. As the current goes to ~1mA to 5mA and Type DAE Circuits have extended or enhanced output nodes that allow Flux Angular Dampening (FAD) Propulsion System research, Flyable Crafts Bound to the Dense Atmosphere can be fabricated. Unlike in particle physics, it is the forces harnessed from the accumulated charges that will be used in the developments.
Expulsion and Attraction
  • In this case, when using merged dual polarities, like-polarity XTA nodes may repel each other, or in some other cases, like-signals cancel each other. If a XTA is active, the like polarity companion node used with the tapped XTA allowing high current flow is caused by repulsion. It’s also caused by XTA Retention that allows Expulsion. Moreover, the opposite polarity companion node used with the tapped XTA allows high current flow all the same. It’s also caused by XTA Retention that allows Attraction:
    • Imaginary Batteries are capacitive or resistive-capacitive components, they most likely function because of both Attraction and Expulsion as the Force Components Circuit accumulates charges and reaches a frequency of 1GHz. Most likely the accumulated free charges follow the same saturation parameters as the frequency. Both variables start as some lingering saturation of a quantized value. In retrospect, all forms of matter vibrate, elementary particles exist, and they are constantly in motion, therefore frequency exists in everything. All the variables need is a medium that accepts the initial resonance frequency.
    • A single XTA power source is powered by one or two Imaginary Batteries. The battery polarities of a Dual XTA power source can be configured as four batteries (positive, negative to negative, positive), and (positive, negative to negative, positive). Or four batteries (positive, negative to negative, positive), and (negative, positive to positive, negative). Two Imaginary Batteries can also be configured as (positive, negative to negative, positive), or (positive, negative to positive, negative). There is also a way to configure an Imaginary Battery used by a single Type XTA Circuit having a dual or a single XTA.
    • In any way Imaginary Batteries are configured, only the XTA polarities of a capable Force Components Circuit will change from the initial polarity if the battery configuration was charged. When two Force Components Circuits are used, if it’s looked at like top and bottom circuits, and the top and bottom circuit’s XTA is positive, if the battery polarities of the top circuit are flipped, the top circuit’s XTA will be negative and the bottom circuit’s XTA polarity will remain negative. Let’s imagine that the Force Components Circuits having opposite XTA polarities being managed is the 200GV to 1TV XTA circuit that’s the original circuit that the Type DAE Circuits, the Type VAE Circuits, and the Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits were configured from. In that case, when the opposite polarity XTAs are placed between the nodes of a resistor, it’s then the CTA of the circuits rises. The Type DAE Circuits, the Type VAE Circuits, and the Dual XTA Type DAE Circuits were researched to prevent that and more. There are still many bad outcomes if the derived circuits are used incorrectly.

To view one of the videos without effort, please r-click on the video image and open it in a new browser window or tab:

Type VAE Solution Circuit Output
Type-I DAE Solution Circuit Output
Type-II DAE Solution Circuit Output (DAE Module || VAE Module)